Ship supply has two catalogue standards, and almost every purchasing team ends up asking the same question: should our requisitions carry IMPA codes, ISSA codes, or both? The short answer — use whichever your organisation has standardised on, quote both when you have them, and never rely on free text alone. Here is the longer answer.
| IMPA | ISSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Publisher | International Marine Purchasing Association | International Shipsuppliers & Services Association |
| Perspective | Founded by the buying side (owners, managers, purchasing teams) | Founded by the supplying side (ship chandlers) |
| Catalogue | Marine Stores Guide (MSG) | ISSA Ship Stores Catalogue |
| Code format | 6-digit numeric | Numeric, section-based (format differs from IMPA) |
| Typical users | Fleet purchasing departments, procurement software | Chandlers and port suppliers |
The two catalogues overlap heavily in coverage: provisions, cabin and deck stores, engine stores, safety equipment and more. Many products can be referenced through either system, and experienced suppliers recognise both.
Procurement platforms use catalogue codes as the backbone of item master data: requisition lines link to codes, supplier quotes attach to the same line, and price history accumulates per code across orders. That turns the IMPA/ISSA discipline from a documentation habit into automatic, comparable data — including when you source from cost-competitive hubs like Turkey (see our Turkey ship supply guide).
Procumare keeps your item catalogue coded and consistent: send structured RFQs, let suppliers quote through a simple link — no account needed — and compare line by line with price history at hand.
Explore Procumare